2. In Web 2.0, the author states:
“The successful companies all give up something expensive but considered critical to get something valuable for free that was once expensive. For example, Wikipedia gives up central editorial control in return for speed and breadth. Napster gave up on the idea of "the catalog" (all the songs the vendor
was selling) and got breadth. Amazon gave up on the idea of having a physical storefront but got to serve the entire world. Google gave up on the big customers (initially) and got the 80% whose needs weren't being met.” ?
Keeping this in mind, if products like Blackboard were universally available without cost to the end-users, would the teaching community be more inclined to adopt its use by collaborating with developers in making the product more user-friendly (e.g. developing add-ins and enhancements like integrated ID capability, seemless integration of third-party products, etc.)?
And if the product was better, would teachers be more inclined to incorporate additional technological tools into their day-to-day operations (i.e. if this is a teacher’s only exposure to technology, does frustration with existing software cause unnecessary barriers to adopting tech in the classroom?)
Making a short question long...... how much do inferior tools stymie the adoption of technology in schools?
